In University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v PK & Anor [2025] EWCOP 17 (T3), McKendrick J was asked… Read more
Tag: medical treatment
Serious medical treatment cases and naming clinicians – the Supreme Court decides
In the conjoined appeals of Abbasi and Haastrup [2025] UKSC 15, the Supreme Court has grappled with the questions of (1) the jurisdiction of… Read more
Consultation, (rotten) compromises and challenging complacency – Hayden J on the warpath
NHS South East London Integrated Care Board v JP & Ors [2025] EWCOP 4 T3 and [2025] EWCOP 8 (T3)… Read more
Anorexia, the Court of Protection and the changing calculus of decision-making
When and under what circumstances it is legitimate not to treat those with anorexia is a very contentious topic, and… Read more
Best interests decision-making as an aspect of good clinical governance – and further guidance on the way
NHS North Central London Integrated Care Board v Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability & Anor [2024] EWCOP 66 (T3) is the most… Read more
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights seeks to balance the right to life and the right to autonomy
The decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Pindo Mulla v Spain [2024] ECHR 753 is a very… Read more
Belief and mental capacity – the Court of Appeal decides
In Re Sudiksha Thirulamesh (dec’d) [2024] EWCA Civ 896 the Court of Appeal has made very clear how to approach… Read more
A decision for the court or the doctors? A stark question for Henke J
Re AA (Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment: No Best Interests Decision) [2024] EWCOP 39 (T3) is a difficult case. It concerned… Read more
Futility and best interests before the Court of Protection
When medical treatment can be considered to be a futile is an important, but sometimes difficult, question. What can make… Read more
A judicial reminder of the hard edges of the treatment regime under the MHA 1983
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust & Anor v KAG & Ors [2024] EWCOP 38 (T3) is a case… Read more